add es Proxy for calling ExtendScript
#83
+95
−48
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
@justintaylor-dev this looks awesome and seems like an obvious addition to bolt-cep, wondering what you think... |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This adds a new method for calling your ExtendScript functions, (tentatively) called
es.This uses a
Proxyso you can call them as methods, rather than passing in the function name as a string. It also enables using VS Code's "Go to Definition" to go to the ExtendScript implementation of the function.Under the hood it uses the existing
evalTSfunction.Think I added it in all the right spots, made it the default in the README rather than adding a third option, but whatever you think works best!